AccuRanker vs BeVisible
AccuRanker is a dedicated rank tracker; BeVisible is a AI-visibility tracker with a publishing loop. Below they are compared row by row on the thirteen things buyers in this category actually ask about — with SERP Checker in the third column, because the honest answer to “which of these two” is sometimes “neither”.
Quick answer
Start with AccuRanker if…
Rank-tracking speed and accuracy are your top priority — AccuRanker's on-demand refresh is best-in-class.
Start with BeVisible if…
You have exactly one brand, want the gap-to-published-article loop out of the box, and 50 prompts is enough.
At a glance
| AccuRanker | BeVisible | SERP Checker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | ~$224/mo (2,000 keywords) | $99/mo Growth (1 project, 50 prompts, daily); Custom is quote-only | From $19/mo — 7-day trial + free one-off audit at /audit |
| Classic Google rank tracking | Yes (fastest refresh) | No (AEO only) | Yes — every plan |
| AI-visibility (AEO) in the same workspace | Yes (AccuLLM module) | Yes (core product) | Yes — same workspace, every paid plan from $19/mo |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews + AI Mode (Gemini/Claude not listed) | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews (5) | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews — all 6 in the AEO module, no per-engine add-on |
| Multi-client agency workspace | Yes (unlimited seats) | Custom tier only (“bulk projects or brands”, agency workflows) | Yes — 1 client on the $19 Monitor or $39 AI Visibility tier, 3 on Starter, 15 on Pro, 50 on Business |
| MCP server (AI-agent native) | Yes (official, plus a ChatGPT app) | Yes — included on Growth | Yes — queried with a REST API key, so Business tier |
Where the two actually differ
6 of the 13 compared rows come out differently for these two tools. The rest they answer the same way, so they will not decide anything for you.
| AccuRanker | BeVisible | |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Google rank tracking | Yes (fastest refresh) | No (AEO only) |
| AI-crawler log analytics | Not documented | Yes — server-side SDK, 10 bots, intent categories and missing 4xx URLs |
| GA4 + Search Console analytics | Via GSC/GA integration | Not documented |
| White-label client reports | Expert tier and up | Not documented |
| REST API | Expert tier and up | Not documented |
| Multi-client agency workspace | Yes (unlimited seats) | Custom tier only (“bulk projects or brands”, agency workflows) |
Full comparison
| Feature | AccuRanker | BeVisible | SERP Checker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Google rank tracking | Yes (fastest refresh) | No (AEO only) | Yes — every plan |
| AI-visibility (AEO) in the same workspace | Yes (AccuLLM module) | Yes (core product) | Yes — same workspace, every paid plan from $19/mo |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews + AI Mode (Gemini/Claude not listed) | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews (5) | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews — all 6 in the AEO module, no per-engine add-on |
| Technical SEO audit | No | No classic SEO audit; content-gap actions instead | Yes — every plan |
| AI-crawler log analytics | Not documented | Yes — server-side SDK, 10 bots, intent categories and missing 4xx URLs | Yes — access-log ingest via the REST API, so Business tier; per-bot hits, crawled paths and refusals |
| Competitor gap analysis | Partial | Share of voice and competitor mentions inside AI answers | Yes — every plan |
| GA4 + Search Console analytics | Via GSC/GA integration | Not documented | Yes — verified first-party GA4/GSC data from the Pro tier ($158/mo); CSV/JSON export plus a Looker Studio connector (source in integrations/, one-time deploy to your own Google account) |
| White-label client reports | Expert tier and up | Not documented | Yes (Business tier) |
| Interface languages | English-only UI | English-only interface; region and language support is a Custom-tier item | EN / RU / UK / PL / SK / CS / DE (tracks any region) |
| REST API | Expert tier and up | Not documented | Yes (Business tier) |
| MCP server (AI-agent native) | Yes (official, plus a ChatGPT app) | Yes — included on Growth | Yes — queried with a REST API key, so Business tier |
| Multi-client agency workspace | Yes (unlimited seats) | Custom tier only (“bulk projects or brands”, agency workflows) | Yes — 1 client on the $19 Monitor or $39 AI Visibility tier, 3 on Starter, 15 on Pro, 50 on Business |
| Entry price | ~$224/mo (2,000 keywords) | $99/mo Growth (1 project, 50 prompts, daily); Custom is quote-only | From $19/mo — 7-day trial + free one-off audit at /audit |
Pricing
AccuRanker
AccuRanker's lowest paid tier is around $224/mo (2,000 keywords), with white-label and API gated to the ~$764/mo Expert tier. SERP Checker starts at $39/mo and bundles audit, analytics and AEO. See /pricing.
BeVisible
BeVisible publishes one self-serve plan: Growth at $99/mo, covering 1 project, 50 tracked prompts, 5 AI platforms, daily tracking, 10 optimized articles a month and MCP access, with a free trial of unstated length. Anything beyond that — more prompts, bulk brands, regions and languages, agency workflows — is the quote-only Custom tier. SERP Checker starts at $39/mo with published prices at every tier and a 7-day trial. See /pricing.
What neither of them does
Derived from the same two columns above: rows where SERP Checker ships the capability outright and neither AccuRanker nor BeVisible does. Both of their recorded values are printed so you can check the claim.
| AccuRanker | BeVisible | SERP Checker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO audit | No | No classic SEO audit; content-gap actions instead | Yes — every plan |
| Competitor gap analysis | Partial | Share of voice and competitor mentions inside AI answers | Yes — every plan |
| GA4 + Search Console analytics | Via GSC/GA integration | Not documented | Yes — verified first-party GA4/GSC data from the Pro tier ($158/mo); CSV/JSON export plus a Looker Studio connector (source in integrations/, one-time deploy to your own Google account) |
| White-label client reports | Expert tier and up | Not documented | Yes (Business tier) |
| REST API | Expert tier and up | Not documented | Yes (Business tier) |
FAQ
Is AccuRanker or BeVisible cheaper?
On published entry pricing, BeVisible starts lower: $99/mo Growth (1 project, 50 prompts, daily); Custom is quote-only against ~$224/mo (2,000 keywords) for AccuRanker. SERP Checker starts at $39/mo and includes both Google rank tracking and AI-visibility in that price.
Do AccuRanker and BeVisible both track AI answers?
AccuRanker: Yes (AccuLLM module) Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews + AI Mode (Gemini/Claude not listed). BeVisible: Yes (core product) Engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews (5). SERP Checker tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews in the same workspace as Google rankings.
Is there a cheaper AccuRanker alternative?
SERP Checker starts at $39/mo, far below AccuRanker's ~$224/mo floor, while adding AEO, technical audit, analytics and white-label reports.
Is there a cheaper alternative to BeVisible?
Yes. BeVisible’s only published plan is $99/mo for one project and 50 prompts. SERP Checker starts at $39/mo, publishes every tier, and includes Google rank tracking that BeVisible does not do at any price.
Related comparisons
AccuRanker vs Ahrefs · AccuRanker vs AthenaHQ · AccuRanker vs Mangools · AccuRanker vs Nightwatch · AccuRanker vs Otterly.ai · AccuRanker vs Peec AI
AccuRanker review · BeVisible review
See all 91 comparisons · All tool reviews · All alternatives · Free tools
Or track Google and AI search in one tool
Rank tracking, AI-answer visibility across six engines, technical audits, AI-crawler analytics and white-label reports — from $39/mo, published pricing, free audit first.
Run the free auditSources
https://www.accuranker.com · https://bevisible.app
Competitor pricing and features are taken from their public pages as of July 2026 and may change — verify on their site before deciding. Where a vendor's docs were unclear we say so rather than guess. Every value in the tables above is a figure recorded from the vendor's own public pages, not an estimate. Product and company names are the trademarks of their respective owners.